Navy Awards Leidos $4.3 Billion System Modernization Contract

The Department of Defense has announced that Leidos, Inc., of Reston, Virginia, has been awarded a ceiling $4,336,822,777 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for the Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization program.

As a service provider integrator, Leidos will provide an electronic health record off-the-shelf solution, integration activities and deployment across the Military Health System.

The contract includes firm-fixed-price, cost-plus-fixed-fee, cost-plus-incentive fee, and fixed-price incentive pricing arrangements.

The contract has a two-year initial ordering period, with two three-year option periods, and a potential two-year award term, which, if awarded, would bring the total ordering period to ten years.

The Navy received six offers in response to the solicitation (N00039-15-D-0044).

The Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, San Diego, California, is the contracting activity.

For more information, see the DoD release.

SAIC/Leidos Pays $1.5 Million to Settle FCA Suit

The Justice Department announced today that Science Applications International Corporation, now known as Leidos Holdings Inc., has agreed to pay $1.5 million to resolve a False Claims Act lawsuit alleging that it knowingly engaged in prohibited conflicts of interest as a contractor for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Between 1992 and 2000, SAIC held two contracts with the NRC to provide scientific and technical services, including assisting the NRC in its consideration of a rule that could have permitted the release or recycling of certain types and quantities of material with very low levels of radioactivity below regulatory safety limits.   NRC decided not to proceed with such a rule.

The government alleged that, under these contracts, SAIC was required to avoid conflicting business relationships that could bias SAIC’s work for the NRC.  The government alleged that SAIC repeatedly and falsely certified that it had no such conflicting business relationships, when SAIC actually engaged in multiple business relationships with entities that had a financial interest in the outcome of the rulemaking.

In July 2008, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the government that SAIC violated the FCA and breached its contract  by engaging in undisclosed conflicts of interest.   On appeal, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed judgment for the government on the breach of contract claim, but partially reversed the judgment on the FCA claims based on two jury instructions and remanded the case for a new trial on those claims.

For more information, see the DOJ release.